Guided workflows

Start from an employment-research task, not a blank prompt.

Tribuno's first public-facing workflow set is intentionally narrow: it helps users inspect common Employment Tribunal research patterns with citations and caveats.

View sample outputs How Tribuno works

Tribuno provides Employment Tribunal research assistance and legal information only. It does not provide legal advice, representation, or guaranteed outcome prediction.

Workflow catalogue

Five controlled starting points

These workflows are not exhaustive legal coverage. They are practical entry points for source-cited research and controlled early-access evaluation.

Unfair dismissal process review

Procedural fairnessReasonable investigationAppeal handling

Compare investigation, consultation, warnings, appeal, and reasonableness patterns across selected tribunal decisions.

Output shape: Process-focused research memo with a comparable-decision matrix, ACAS context and source-check caveats.
Not for: Outcome predictionFinal case conclusionUnchecked witness evidence

Open workflow View sample

Disability discrimination and reasonable adjustments

Adjustment requestsKnowledge and evidenceImplementation delay

Structure adjustment requests, knowledge, occupational health evidence, implementation delay, and comparator reasoning.

Output shape: Evidence-gap memo organised around knowledge, adjustment specificity, implementation delay and source caveats.
Not for: Diagnosing disability statusReplacing medical evidenceOutcome prediction

Open workflow View sample

Whistleblowing detriment

Protected disclosuresDetriment chronologyCausation evidence

Review protected disclosure, causation, detriment, chronology, and employer explanation patterns without predicting outcome.

Output shape: Chronology-led memo separating disclosure status, alleged detriment, employer explanation and causation caution.
Not for: Assuming disclosure statusCausation predictionUnreviewed chronology

Open workflow View sample

ACAS disciplinary or grievance Lens

Disciplinary processGrievance handlingAppeals

Inspect ACAS Code and guidance passages beside selected ET decisions while keeping guidance separate from tribunal comparables.

Output shape: Lens brief showing promoted guidance passages beside selected tribunal reasoning with source-family labels preserved.
Not for: Treating guidance as a tribunal findingReplacing current source checksOutcome prediction

Open workflow View sample

Remedy and award comparison

Award signalsMitigationRemedy reasoning

Compare remedy reasoning, compensation headings, mitigation, reductions, and award signals across source decisions.

Output shape: Matrix-led remedy research note comparing reasoning patterns while marking evidence gaps and award caution.
Not for: Award predictionTariff-style estimatesUnchecked loss evidence

Open workflow View sample

Workflow rules

What every workflow must preserve

The same guardrails apply whether the user starts with unfair dismissal, reasonable adjustments, ACAS process or remedy research.

Selected sources only

Memos should cite decisions the user selected and reviewed, not every search hit.

Separate Lens context

ACAS, statute, procedure and higher-authority material should stay distinct from ET comparables.

No outcome prediction

Workflow output should support research judgement without promising likely results or merits.

Workspace access starts with sample workflows.

Request access after reviewing what Tribuno does and the limits it preserves.

Request workspace access Read FAQ